<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten of the best&#8230; Science fiction television series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Falconer</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-6043</link>
		<dc:creator>Falconer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-6043</guid>
		<description>1. Battlestar Galactica (1978)
2. Star Trek (1966)
3. Alias (2001)
4. Firefly (2002)

...that’s all I’ve got...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Battlestar Galactica (1978)<br />
2. Star Trek (1966)<br />
3. Alias (2001)<br />
4. Firefly (2002)</p>
<p>&#8230;that’s all I’ve got&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Rye</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5756</link>
		<dc:creator>James Rye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-5756</guid>
		<description>you Numptys.

Firefly ahead of Galactica? what the....

Having TNG at 6 is patently ludicrous as it is the single most influential and popular SciFi ever.

And what is it with you and the lamentable Charlie Jade. The 4400 should be put in its place.

Again! Firefly. 13 episodes barely counts as a TV series.

Does Lost count as SciFi, where is that then? 

Here are the top ten:

Star Trek TOS (the first and the best)
Star Trek TNG
Dr. Who
Star Trek DS9
X Files
Lost
Battlestar Galactica (remake)
Stargate SG1
Babylon 5
The 4400


Yes I think SG1 is very good and only pretentiousness prevents reviewers rating it higher.

Ryeman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you Numptys.</p>
<p>Firefly ahead of Galactica? what the&#8230;.</p>
<p>Having TNG at 6 is patently ludicrous as it is the single most influential and popular SciFi ever.</p>
<p>And what is it with you and the lamentable Charlie Jade. The 4400 should be put in its place.</p>
<p>Again! Firefly. 13 episodes barely counts as a TV series.</p>
<p>Does Lost count as SciFi, where is that then? </p>
<p>Here are the top ten:</p>
<p>Star Trek TOS (the first and the best)<br />
Star Trek TNG<br />
Dr. Who<br />
Star Trek DS9<br />
X Files<br />
Lost<br />
Battlestar Galactica (remake)<br />
Stargate SG1<br />
Babylon 5<br />
The 4400</p>
<p>Yes I think SG1 is very good and only pretentiousness prevents reviewers rating it higher.</p>
<p>Ryeman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jay</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5676</link>
		<dc:creator>jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-5676</guid>
		<description>The first season of Moonlight has just finished here in the UK on Virgin-1 and i appalled to hear that&#039;s it no more it&#039;s been cancelled by the US network...

Bugger is all i can say, yet again that&#039;s another great US TV series that hit the skids way, way to early and we won&#039;t be seeing any more along with:

Terminator (The Sarah Conner Chronicles)
Heist, 
Firefly, 
Life, 
Dirty Sexy Money,
The Unit,
Reaper,
Chuck,
That one about troops in Iraq can&#039;t remember the name
Deadwood,
My Name is Earl
Kipnapped,
Jericho,

Need i go on, i think you get the idea..

Ok not all Sci-Fi but all excellent shows, in their own right, but now vanished forever, while we get sado and mostly crap reality TV shows, and poxy Eastenders, shoved down our throats for years and years, i for one am sick of it...

Time for a revolt, i feel, And why in 2009 with all the Freeview channels and Satelite channels available are we still paying that out dated stealth tax the TV Licence Fee, the BBC should now be independant and have advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first season of Moonlight has just finished here in the UK on Virgin-1 and i appalled to hear that&#8217;s it no more it&#8217;s been cancelled by the US network&#8230;</p>
<p>Bugger is all i can say, yet again that&#8217;s another great US TV series that hit the skids way, way to early and we won&#8217;t be seeing any more along with:</p>
<p>Terminator (The Sarah Conner Chronicles)<br />
Heist,<br />
Firefly,<br />
Life,<br />
Dirty Sexy Money,<br />
The Unit,<br />
Reaper,<br />
Chuck,<br />
That one about troops in Iraq can&#8217;t remember the name<br />
Deadwood,<br />
My Name is Earl<br />
Kipnapped,<br />
Jericho,</p>
<p>Need i go on, i think you get the idea..</p>
<p>Ok not all Sci-Fi but all excellent shows, in their own right, but now vanished forever, while we get sado and mostly crap reality TV shows, and poxy Eastenders, shoved down our throats for years and years, i for one am sick of it&#8230;</p>
<p>Time for a revolt, i feel, And why in 2009 with all the Freeview channels and Satelite channels available are we still paying that out dated stealth tax the TV Licence Fee, the BBC should now be independant and have advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dontlk</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5515</link>
		<dc:creator>Dontlk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-5515</guid>
		<description>Great list, I agree with you about Charlie Jade (truly the best show I&#039;ve ever seen), Babylon 5, The Prisoner, X-Files, SG-1 - true classics of the science-fiction genre - and partially on BSG (one of the best shows, but the ending ruined it for me). 
Firefly - Very enjoyable, but also very unoriginal. Joss Whedon clearly stole many ideas for Firefly(2002) from Starhunter(2000).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list, I agree with you about Charlie Jade (truly the best show I&#8217;ve ever seen), Babylon 5, The Prisoner, X-Files, SG-1 &#8211; true classics of the science-fiction genre &#8211; and partially on BSG (one of the best shows, but the ending ruined it for me).<br />
Firefly &#8211; Very enjoyable, but also very unoriginal. Joss Whedon clearly stole many ideas for Firefly(2002) from Starhunter(2000).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nerdjuice32</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5508</link>
		<dc:creator>nerdjuice32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-5508</guid>
		<description>&#039;KC&#039;.. That wouldn&#039;t happen to mean Kansas City does it? Where I&#039;m living currently.. lol

Ah man, you don&#039;t even think he&#039;s a good writer? Well.. that&#039;s just something I can&#039;t explain.. different tastes to blame I guess. I suppose you could be correct if by &#039;far, far better...&#039;, you&#039;re inferring he&#039;s AMAZING at publicity and just really really good at writing.. :D

James,
Yeah I know.. I have a lot of problems with FOX. Didn&#039;t want to get into it too much, so I didn&#039;t just come off as bias against Fox. It&#039;s not because I hate Fox that I defend Firefly...

They also didn&#039;t air I think 3 other episodes near the end of the season, although one, I honestly didn&#039;t like so much. I think it was &#039;Heart of Gold&#039;. Not my fav.. Not terrible, but probably my least favorite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;KC&#8217;.. That wouldn&#8217;t happen to mean Kansas City does it? Where I&#8217;m living currently.. lol</p>
<p>Ah man, you don&#8217;t even think he&#8217;s a good writer? Well.. that&#8217;s just something I can&#8217;t explain.. different tastes to blame I guess. I suppose you could be correct if by &#8216;far, far better&#8230;&#8217;, you&#8217;re inferring he&#8217;s AMAZING at publicity and just really really good at writing.. <img src='http://www.scifinow.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>James,<br />
Yeah I know.. I have a lot of problems with FOX. Didn&#8217;t want to get into it too much, so I didn&#8217;t just come off as bias against Fox. It&#8217;s not because I hate Fox that I defend Firefly&#8230;</p>
<p>They also didn&#8217;t air I think 3 other episodes near the end of the season, although one, I honestly didn&#8217;t like so much. I think it was &#8216;Heart of Gold&#8217;. Not my fav.. Not terrible, but probably my least favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan T.</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5488</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-5488</guid>
		<description>shame about BSG&#039;s end, one of the best series finales ever, but no mention of the inimitable shame that was (and still is) the end of the X-Files?  and by &quot;end&quot; i mean the last three seasons and most recent film?  :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shame about BSG&#8217;s end, one of the best series finales ever, but no mention of the inimitable shame that was (and still is) the end of the X-Files?  and by &#8220;end&#8221; i mean the last three seasons and most recent film?  :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5473</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-5473</guid>
		<description>&quot;I did consider Space: Above And Beyond. What a great show! I would point out again though that the list isn’t in any order, and I do disagree with you on Firefly, but each to their own.&quot;

Fair enough James, but I&#039;d say Whedon is a far, far better publicist and cult leader than he ever was writer.

And when I say cult leader, I&#039;m not inferring you&#039;re one of the nutters, you&#039;re far, far too polite for that.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I did consider Space: Above And Beyond. What a great show! I would point out again though that the list isn’t in any order, and I do disagree with you on Firefly, but each to their own.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fair enough James, but I&#8217;d say Whedon is a far, far better publicist and cult leader than he ever was writer.</p>
<p>And when I say cult leader, I&#8217;m not inferring you&#8217;re one of the nutters, you&#8217;re far, far too polite for that.  <img src='http://www.scifinow.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddy</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5467</link>
		<dc:creator>maddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-5467</guid>
		<description>I would proudly defend Buffy 6 and 7 over 1, 2 and 3. 

Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would proudly defend Buffy 6 and 7 over 1, 2 and 3. </p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobathin</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5465</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobathin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-5465</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, I loved the Battlestar finale. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s at all a shame where the writers decided to take it. It&#039;s just an incredible episode in my book.

Anyway, it&#039;s nice to see TNG and Firefly on the list too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, I loved the Battlestar finale. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s at all a shame where the writers decided to take it. It&#8217;s just an incredible episode in my book.</p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s nice to see TNG and Firefly on the list too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luiz</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/top-tens/ten-of-the-best-science-fiction-television-series/comment-page-1/#comment-5464</link>
		<dc:creator>Luiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6823#comment-5464</guid>
		<description>One last random thought... the original Galactica may be of some worth, as well Buck Rogers in the XXVth Century (although I&#039;d rather stick with Duck Dodgers in XXIV1/2 Century, in any of his both encarnations): these Glen A. Larson&#039;s series brought the sound and fury of Star Wars space opera to the tv, shaking off the pessimism and glooming mood of 70&#039;s sci-fi tv shows, such as Ark II and the Planet of the Apes tv series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last random thought&#8230; the original Galactica may be of some worth, as well Buck Rogers in the XXVth Century (although I&#8217;d rather stick with Duck Dodgers in XXIV1/2 Century, in any of his both encarnations): these Glen A. Larson&#8217;s series brought the sound and fury of Star Wars space opera to the tv, shaking off the pessimism and glooming mood of 70&#8217;s sci-fi tv shows, such as Ark II and the Planet of the Apes tv series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
