Official website for SciFiNow - the premier sci-fi, fantasy, horror and cult TV website
FOLLOW US ON:
Jan
7

Philip K Dick estate in legal action against Google

by James Rundle

Nexus One phone judged to infringe intellectual property rights.

Title - BladerunnerThe estate of late science fiction author Philip K Dick is considering legal action against Google, the Wall Street Journal reports.

The point in contention is Google’s new mobile phone name, the Nexus One, which the Dick estate feels infringes upon its intellectual property rights from the novel Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep. The Journal quotes Dick’s daughter, Isa Dick Hackett, as saying: “We feel this is a clear infringement of our intellectual-property rights… Our legal team is dealing head-on with this.”

In Dick’s celebrated story, later adapted for the big screen by Ridley Scott into the equally seminal film Blade Runner, an operative for the police chases down artificial humans, whose model number is Nexus 6. The Dick estate has declined to comment on exactly what legal avenue it will be pursuing, but Hackett drew comparisons between the name of the phone and its operating system, Android, as being a clear indication of the market that Google is appealing to.

If the estate decides to sue for infringement and using Dick’s property to sell their product, however, the case may be difficult to win, as they will have to prove that people will automatically associate the name of the phone with the novel. In addition, the word nexus has many different contexts outside of Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep.

  • Tell a Friend
  • Our Twitter provides all the latest Sci-Fi news, reviews, previews, interviews and spoilers, while our Facebook fan page is the best place to communicate with other fans of the SciFiNow magazine.

    2 Comments »

    • Kevin Hall said:

      I’m a fan of the late Philip K Dick and Do Androids… as well as Blade Runner. However, this is going a bit far. The word Nexus is surely used in thousands of companies, and it’s Six not 6. I’m sure it wasn’t intentional and Google have nothing to worry about.

    • vecima said:

      It probably WAS intentional. Google pay homage to the media that they’re fans of.

      Look at wave… At the demonstration they were using lots of language from (and indeed the term “wave” even comes from Firefly / Serenity.

      I agree though, it’s going a bit far with legal action. Still Google may yet learn to keep the homages to things behind closed doors and come up with their own public names for products.

    What's your opinion?

    Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

    Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

    * Required fields