<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five actors who could be the new Superman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:19:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MW</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>MW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-854</guid>
		<description>Superman needs to have some contemporary relevance before it heads back to the big screen. Somewhat like Star Trek, the Superman franchise needs a new lease of life.

A few ideas – Firstly, they need to avoid retelling the Superman origin story in great length and they need to focus less on the Kent / Lane love story. 

I think any new Superman film will have to make an effort to be very big, bombastic and less domesticated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superman needs to have some contemporary relevance before it heads back to the big screen. Somewhat like Star Trek, the Superman franchise needs a new lease of life.</p>
<p>A few ideas – Firstly, they need to avoid retelling the Superman origin story in great length and they need to focus less on the Kent / Lane love story. </p>
<p>I think any new Superman film will have to make an effort to be very big, bombastic and less domesticated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SajiNoKami</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-852</link>
		<dc:creator>SajiNoKami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-852</guid>
		<description>Zachary Quinto -

i don&#039;t think so...

maybe tim drake when the character is in his 30&#039;s
a possible kyle rayner
or even Nightwing... but i just can not see him as superman

ZQ would also make a good Dream [Sandman].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zachary Quinto -</p>
<p>i don&#8217;t think so&#8230;</p>
<p>maybe tim drake when the character is in his 30&#8242;s<br />
a possible kyle rayner<br />
or even Nightwing&#8230; but i just can not see him as superman</p>
<p>ZQ would also make a good Dream [Sandman].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Asadi</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Asadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-839</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t drink.

Seriously, though, for the record, my T-shirt would almost certainly be a Superman one. More than any other comic book character I would like to see him done justice on the big screen. Sadly, in my opinion, that hasn&#039;t yet been achieved… but I live in hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t drink.</p>
<p>Seriously, though, for the record, my T-shirt would almost certainly be a Superman one. More than any other comic book character I would like to see him done justice on the big screen. Sadly, in my opinion, that hasn&#8217;t yet been achieved… but I live in hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Whitfield</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Whitfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-838</guid>
		<description>This is one for the pub, I reckon...after a few beers we&#039;ll probably end up swapping our respective Superman and Batman t-shirts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one for the pub, I reckon&#8230;after a few beers we&#8217;ll probably end up swapping our respective Superman and Batman t-shirts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Asadi</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Asadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-837</guid>
		<description>&quot;Too much made of a decent performance by the supporting actor&quot; is not a criticism of the movie, it&#039;s a criticism of critics, surely.

I agree, though, that there are flaws. But for me they are like tiny blemishes on the skin of Morena Baccarin – more or less irrelevant when compared to the overall achievement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Too much made of a decent performance by the supporting actor&#8221; is not a criticism of the movie, it&#8217;s a criticism of critics, surely.</p>
<p>I agree, though, that there are flaws. But for me they are like tiny blemishes on the skin of Morena Baccarin – more or less irrelevant when compared to the overall achievement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Whitfield</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Whitfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-836</guid>
		<description>TDK has its weaknesses of its own. Overcooked performance from the lead, too much made of a decent performance by the supporting actor, misplaced set pieces, an anti-climatic use of a major villain Batman&#039;s canon and - for me at least - a feeling of incompletness of this piece of the narrative (even if if its the middle part of a trilogy, it should have some sense of timing). TDK feels like its 45 minutes too long or two hours too short: I&#039;ve said before, an LOTR-style DVD of the &quot;humongous cut&quot; would be give the TDK its due perhaps, but it&#039;s by no means the &quot;perfect comic book movie.&quot;

I loved Batman Begins - that, for me, was a far better film than TDK. 

But, back to Superman (keeping things on topic) - I think the key thing you mention there is the terrific lead performance. Reeve carried that movie off in such an amazing way it has set the benchmark for all of its &quot;descendants&quot; and no-one has come up to that mark. Not Bale, not Jackman, not McQuire.

For me, Superman the Movie is as close as I&#039;ve seen to the perfect comic book movie. Relentless silliness? I&#039;m not sure about that: it could be argued that Hackman&#039;s Luthor did balance out the &quot;grandiose mythology&quot; that you mention here, otherwise the film could have become too awe-stuck and bogged down by a sense of a its importance.

All that said, if Menkowitz hand&#039;t severely doctored Puzo&#039;s original script then it would have been a complete disaster and slipped way too far into camp silliness (who loves ya, baby). 

On Superman Returns - I really really enjoyed it. When it became apparent that there would no (immediate) sequel, I read a comment by Donner who advised us not to think of Returns as the beginning, but rather as the third part of the trilogy he started. Viewed from that perspective, it really does make the movie something more than was originally intended and (neatly) avoids answering the questions it raised. 

Not that that&#039;s what should have happened - but still - it works for me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TDK has its weaknesses of its own. Overcooked performance from the lead, too much made of a decent performance by the supporting actor, misplaced set pieces, an anti-climatic use of a major villain Batman&#8217;s canon and &#8211; for me at least &#8211; a feeling of incompletness of this piece of the narrative (even if if its the middle part of a trilogy, it should have some sense of timing). TDK feels like its 45 minutes too long or two hours too short: I&#8217;ve said before, an LOTR-style DVD of the &#8220;humongous cut&#8221; would be give the TDK its due perhaps, but it&#8217;s by no means the &#8220;perfect comic book movie.&#8221;</p>
<p>I loved Batman Begins &#8211; that, for me, was a far better film than TDK. </p>
<p>But, back to Superman (keeping things on topic) &#8211; I think the key thing you mention there is the terrific lead performance. Reeve carried that movie off in such an amazing way it has set the benchmark for all of its &#8220;descendants&#8221; and no-one has come up to that mark. Not Bale, not Jackman, not McQuire.</p>
<p>For me, Superman the Movie is as close as I&#8217;ve seen to the perfect comic book movie. Relentless silliness? I&#8217;m not sure about that: it could be argued that Hackman&#8217;s Luthor did balance out the &#8220;grandiose mythology&#8221; that you mention here, otherwise the film could have become too awe-stuck and bogged down by a sense of a its importance.</p>
<p>All that said, if Menkowitz hand&#8217;t severely doctored Puzo&#8217;s original script then it would have been a complete disaster and slipped way too far into camp silliness (who loves ya, baby). </p>
<p>On Superman Returns &#8211; I really really enjoyed it. When it became apparent that there would no (immediate) sequel, I read a comment by Donner who advised us not to think of Returns as the beginning, but rather as the third part of the trilogy he started. Viewed from that perspective, it really does make the movie something more than was originally intended and (neatly) avoids answering the questions it raised. </p>
<p>Not that that&#8217;s what should have happened &#8211; but still &#8211; it works for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Asadi</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Asadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-835</guid>
		<description>The Dark Knight is absolutely a superior movie to Superman: The Movie. 

I respect Donner&#039;s film&#039;s place in the industry and it has some decent moments with a terrific lead performance but it is not the flawless masterpiece so many believe it to be. It&#039;s drawn out, frequently dull and struggles to balance its grandiose mythology with the relentless silliness of the later acts.

The Dark Knight is a much more coherent, engaging experience, and one that has more to say than most other comic book movies put together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dark Knight is absolutely a superior movie to Superman: The Movie. </p>
<p>I respect Donner&#8217;s film&#8217;s place in the industry and it has some decent moments with a terrific lead performance but it is not the flawless masterpiece so many believe it to be. It&#8217;s drawn out, frequently dull and struggles to balance its grandiose mythology with the relentless silliness of the later acts.</p>
<p>The Dark Knight is a much more coherent, engaging experience, and one that has more to say than most other comic book movies put together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Whitfield</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Whitfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-834</guid>
		<description>yeah, but you rated The Dark Knight, Aaron...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, but you rated The Dark Knight, Aaron&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Asadi</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Asadi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-833</guid>
		<description>For the record, I liked Routh too. Shame the rest of the movie was an uninspired, overblown homage to a wildly overrated comic book movie.

Yeah, that&#039;s right, I said it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I liked Routh too. Shame the rest of the movie was an uninspired, overblown homage to a wildly overrated comic book movie.</p>
<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s right, I said it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptainSubtext</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/five-actors-who-could-be-the-new-superman/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptainSubtext</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=3724#comment-831</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like any of these suggestions as Superman(apart from Reeve of course!), then again I liked Superman Returns. The movie looked amazing and Routh was convincing. Not to mention it had Kevin Spacey as Luthor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like any of these suggestions as Superman(apart from Reeve of course!), then again I liked Superman Returns. The movie looked amazing and Routh was convincing. Not to mention it had Kevin Spacey as Luthor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

