<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive: Sky high hopes for Blake&#8217;s 7 remake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/exclusive-sky-high-hopes-for-blakes-7-remake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/exclusive-sky-high-hopes-for-blakes-7-remake/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:42:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jago Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/exclusive-sky-high-hopes-for-blakes-7-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-7001</link>
		<dc:creator>Jago Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 08:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6473#comment-7001</guid>
		<description>I thought there&#039;d already been an unofficial remake of Blake&#039;s Seven. It was called Farscape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought there&#8217;d already been an unofficial remake of Blake&#8217;s Seven. It was called Farscape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/exclusive-sky-high-hopes-for-blakes-7-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-6757</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6473#comment-6757</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d settle for a Region 1 DVD release of the original series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d settle for a Region 1 DVD release of the original series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by LeonardDeCandia</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/exclusive-sky-high-hopes-for-blakes-7-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-6448</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by LeonardDeCandia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6473#comment-6448</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by LeonardDeCandia [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by LeonardDeCandia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/exclusive-sky-high-hopes-for-blakes-7-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-5820</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6473#comment-5820</guid>
		<description>BBC has the NEW American inspired Blake&#039;s &quot;in the works!

let everyone know! Looks official from sources at BBC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBC has the NEW American inspired Blake&#8217;s &#8220;in the works!</p>
<p>let everyone know! Looks official from sources at BBC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/exclusive-sky-high-hopes-for-blakes-7-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-5732</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6473#comment-5732</guid>
		<description>Just a rumor, but there is a NEW, TOTALLY original re-conception of Blake&#039;s  being in the works at BBC
It has the name, but is a whole &quot;&#039;nuther thing&quot;. Very different!

something about an american producer/writer having pitched a great concept and re-imagining---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a rumor, but there is a NEW, TOTALLY original re-conception of Blake&#8217;s  being in the works at BBC<br />
It has the name, but is a whole &#8220;&#8216;nuther thing&#8221;. Very different!</p>
<p>something about an american producer/writer having pitched a great concept and re-imagining&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grahame Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.scifinow.co.uk/news/exclusive-sky-high-hopes-for-blakes-7-remake/comment-page-1/#comment-4867</link>
		<dc:creator>Grahame Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scifinow.co.uk/?p=6473#comment-4867</guid>
		<description>I wish everyone the best of luck with this venture. Blake&#039;s 7 is a show that really deserves a revival - the core concept and characters are what made the show so enjoyable, and they&#039;re timeless. I&#039;m a huge fan of the original, and certainly not precious about a modern remake. I&#039;d love to see them do something as dark and daring as the Battlestar retooling. The Blake audio reimagining was excellent (the recent &#039;early years&#039; audios, not so much).  It worries me, though,  that over a year after the initial announcement it&#039;s still at the draft script stage. Surely we&#039;d be lucky to see this before 2012? 2011 would make sense, as it could take advantage of the 30th anniversary of the show&#039;s last series. Fingers crossed this all come together!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish everyone the best of luck with this venture. Blake&#8217;s 7 is a show that really deserves a revival &#8211; the core concept and characters are what made the show so enjoyable, and they&#8217;re timeless. I&#8217;m a huge fan of the original, and certainly not precious about a modern remake. I&#8217;d love to see them do something as dark and daring as the Battlestar retooling. The Blake audio reimagining was excellent (the recent &#8216;early years&#8217; audios, not so much).  It worries me, though,  that over a year after the initial announcement it&#8217;s still at the draft script stage. Surely we&#8217;d be lucky to see this before 2012? 2011 would make sense, as it could take advantage of the 30th anniversary of the show&#8217;s last series. Fingers crossed this all come together!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
