![]()
Released: 30 April
Certificate: 12A
Director: Jon Favreau
Screenwriters: Justin Theroux
Cast: Robert Downey Jr, Mickey Rourke, Sam Rockwell, Don Cheadle
Distributor: Paramount Pictures
Running Time: 124 mins
Well that didn’t last long. It might have been some way short of stellar but the first Iron Man was a smart opening gambit from Marvel Studios, nicely buffing expectations for the blockbusters to follow, the sequel to Tony Stark’s origin story included. But with the follow-up to Marvel’s maiden adventure finally with us, hopes have been crushed like so many buildings in the film’s sterile climactic battle.
The popcorn picks up where the last bucket left off, with Stark now a hero to the US and a champion of world peace. To celebrate he’s holding a year-long tech-show shindig that makes Steve Jobs’ presentations look like airport hotel seminars. Meanwhile, the US Senate is requesting he turns in his suit’s blueprints to protect his country from other robot-shaped threats. Meanwhile, an evil genius, Whiplash, is plotting to humiliate Stark, avenging his father’s Howard Stark-influenced deportation. Meanwhile, Justin Hammer, friend of the US Senate, is plotting ways to make a buck by beating Stark at his own super-suit game. Meanwhile, with their romance simmering in the background, Stark decides to promote Pepper Potts to CEO of Stark Industries, which also sees the introduction of Natalie Rushman, who turns out to be a spy for SHIELD and none other than Natasha Romanov aka The Black Widow. Meanwhile, Stark is hiding a life-threatening condition brought about by his recently-toxic reactor-heart… By now we’re sure we’ve made our point – Iron Man 2 simply has far too much going on. With so much story it struggles to have any real sense of direction, purpose or, most crucially, drama, with narrative focus shoved aside in favour of merchandise opportunities and noise. Individually the scenes might be passable enough, more often than not aiming for the quick wit and easy tone of the first film, but together they are an incoherent mess, anxious to please fanboys, hardware nuts and the Saturday night crowd alike. Burdened with so many distractions, even the Downey Jr-shaped charisma that fuelled the first movie’s propulsion into the superhero stratosphere is choked. And to think we didn’t even mention War Machine, Nick Fury, Stark Snr’s oddly prescient legacy, the creation of a new element and Whiplash and Hammer’s depressingly-predictable partnership.
Whereas the first Iron Man felt like a short boost away from our world in terms of possibility, the sequel seems to be three or four, presenting a cartoon reality that’s much harder to invest in or engage with. In this sense it’s a much more preposterous film than it should be, and furthermore it’s one that plays everything for laughs at any given opportunity – even Captain America’s shield becomes the butt of an unnecessary joke. Seemingly every single action scene in the film, of which there aren’t many, is littered with gags, undermining any tension and consequently underwhelming. As well, it’s yet another summer blockbuster that completely fails to convince the audience that its hero is ever in any real danger. Even an unsuited Tony on a devastated Monaco race track against a determined Whiplash and amid a fireballing wreckage never feels less than utterly safe. Presumably it never occurred to anyone that an invincible Iron Man might also be a boring one.
And it’s perhaps with Iron Man himself that the long-term problem lies. This is a character who isn’t blessed with great villains, or at least not in the same way Spider-Man or Batman are. It’s a point punctuated by the final alloy-flavoured fisticuffs, which sees Iron Man fight an opponent that could quite easily have been replaced by the last film’s Iron Monger. It too frequently seems that Iron Man’s battles could simply be replaced with a scene featuring Stark and his opponent measuring their respective suit’s RAM, with a glance towards their supporting company’s share prices, before shaking hands and agreeing that Stark does in fact have the superior suit; the outcomes are tediously predictable and as cold as Stark’s outer-shell. Too, although there might be plenty of superpowers, there is a distinct absence of superheroics, the kind that saw Spider-Man stop a train or Bruce Wayne sacrifice his life for the good of Gotham at the end of The Dark Knight. The very nature of Iron Man struggles to allow for Stark to overcome the odds – he wins because he’s the favourite – and without this allowance the great moments, the moments that really make us cheer, are tragically non-existent. For the series’ fortunes to improve it will have to address the inherent problems with its hero and rely on an innovation that even the formidable Stark would strain to conceive.
There is still hope that Marvel can make its mark on cinema but it can only do so if it keeps its ambition in check and stays focused on making quality films instead of profitable franchises. For Iron Man 2, the emphasis was clearly on the latter and we’re all poorer for it.

















“It too frequently seems that Iron Man’s battles could simply be replaced with a scene featuring Stark and his opponent measuring their respective suit’s RAM, with a glance towards their supporting company’s share prices, before shaking hands and agreeing that Stark does in fact have the superior suit”.
Oh, I don’t know. That could be amusing :D
Woe, though. I’d been looking forward to this one!
Pity… I might just go to see it anyway but if it is as bad as you say then the future looks bleak for Iron Man… Really hope the other Marvel movies are going to be ace! :)
An excellent review, Mr Aaron -
you touch on many points that bothered me about this overblown, silly sequel. Particularly, the return of the slapstick humour that lead to every scene ending with a quip or some kind of sight gag.
The Black Widow character was pointless. Unfortunately, being portrayed by someone who can’t really act didn’t help (Hilary Swank as the Black Widow in future, please) and few of her scenes have any logic to them. Does she walk up and down the diner so people can see her behind???
Iron Man 2 is the ultimate example of “digitally dependant” film making. The set piece with ALL of the Hammer droids, etc, didn’t even register. Being 100% CGI, there was no sense of anticipation or tension. When you watch films like James Cameron’s Aliens or Robocop (these AND the first Star Wars films are templates for any wannabe super hero movie), the mechanical effects just LOOK REAL! You believed the Power loader and the Alien Queen were going at it but in the latest generation of computer generated Marvel Studio movies, it just looks like a cartoon, digital animation and that takes these kinds of films right out at the knees.
Iron Man 2 was really poor. I hope Thor is immune to such slapstick/poor plotting just as the anti-bigotry theme of the X-Movies rendered them immune to the typical studio treatment of condescension and jokey humour.
I really enjoyed Iron Man 2. I am always worried when it comes to sequels where they have too many actors vying for the screen, but it did work. I liked Tony and Pepper’s relationship, I loved Mickey Rourke and Sam Rockwell. What made it though is Robert Downey Jnr.
I’m not sure why Terrence Howard was replaced by Don Cheadle (possibly I missed some news on this..) I like both actors, but it was distracting having a change of actor. There was far too much CGI and I did think too much fighting I had to look away from the screen as I had enough of the shooting (lights maybe).
I just love the iron man suit – I want one :-)
All in all really enjoyable film.
All good points raised and yes it tried to include too much and spent too much time setting up other films and storylines. The action sequences lacked so much substance and were over so quickly the second showdown between whiplash and Iron Man & and War Machine was hugely disappointing and over in what seemed like moments. The film does try to make various nods to other characters (like the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it Captain America teaser) and events from the vast Marvel universe but the Black Widow character just seemed to be chucked in to fulfill an ‘eye candy’ roll and little else – her role was otherwise redundant and did nothing to flesh out who the character was.
As critical as I am of the film though …….I still thoroughly enjoyed watching the film! Make of that what you will, but I would still consider the 2 star rating a little harsh, and would personally give it 3 stars, as there are plenty of films out there that are considerably less enjoyable (the Original Hulk, Spiderman 3, Superman Returns, I could go on….). If you go watch this film just looking for a fun evening in with a film you could do a lot worse.